Are New Ways of Working actually helping? Are we making work better, or are we just fooling ourselves? I can't help but wonder: do most organisations truly have the interest, capacity, and energy to embark on this journey? And even if those stars align, can people sustain energy for new ways of working in the long run? Or are we underestimating the deeper challenges of shifting behaviours, understanding complexity, and breaking free from outdated paradigms?
Do We Have the Chops for Behaviour Change?
Do organisations and consultants have the chops to navigate the challenge of behaviour change? Truth be told, Iām having a slight wobble about the new ways of working movement on this front. Sure, there are success storiesābut for every win, how many efforts fizzle out or backtrack when the initial enthusiasm wanes, or a key advocate leaves? In both self-managing organisations Iāve been part of, things quickly reverted to more traditional ways soon after the CEO who championed the journey departed. An all too familiar story.
While Iāve seen this happen more than once, it seems myself and others havenāt yet figured out how to prevent efforts from frequently fizzling and failing. Could it be that we havenāt yet developed the capacity to facilitate the deep behavioural shifts required? Or is there something more fundamental at play, like the paradigms that shape our thinking?
Are āParadigmsā the Problem?
Maybe the issue is bigger than our capacity for change. Paradigms shape how we understand the world and define what is considered legitimate practice in any given field. The challenge is that most of us don't realise weāre trapped within these invisible boundaries. Paradigm shiftsāthose fundamental changes in thought and practiceācan take decades or even centuries to come to fruition. Think of the shift from a geocentric view of the universe (where the Earth was believed to be the centre of everything) to a heliocentric one (with the Sun at the centre). It took over a century for this radical shift in thinking to gain acceptance, despite overwhelming evidence. Maybe weāre in the midst of a similar shift, or maybe we're clinging to an illusion of one.
Either way, paradigms are powerful forces, causing leaders to stick rigidly to what they know, making only minor adjustments to old methods, even when those methods continue to fail. We need a paradigm shift, but that doesnāt mean weāll get one. So is the New Ways of Working movement truly part of a paradigm shift, or just a passing trend? We may not know for many, many years.
Do We Really Understand Complexity?
And then thereās the issue of complexity. Traditional top-down management and linear thinkingābetter suited to simpler, more predictable environmentsāstruggle in todayās complex organisations, which are riddled with unpredictability. The outdated belief that organisations move in a straight line from problem to solution leads to false expectations of orderāBS that consultancies sell because too many leaders still mistakenly buy into it. People crave and therefore buy certainty even when it doesnāt exist. This might explain why so many organisational interventions miss the mark.
If we donāt truly grasp the complexities of organisational change, can we honestly expect new ways of working to succeed? Understanding organisations as complex adaptive systemsāwhere multiple parts interact and adapt in unpredictable waysāis crucial. But how many of us are ready to face what that really means? Are we prepared to acknowledge that change isn't linear but rather a tangled web of interconnected factors?
Take behaviour change, for example. Itās not just about telling people to act differently; itās about recognising that their actions are shaped by a web of influencesālike workplace culture, individual mindsets, and external pressures. Do most leaders and consultants really understand how deep and intricate this is? Or are they still searching for and prescribing simple, step-by-step solutions to challenges that are anything but straightforward?
More Questions than Answers
One of the few certainties in this space is that there is no roadmap or blueprint to make new ways of working work. Many of the suggestions out there are well-meaning oversimplifications from people who donāt fully grasp the complexity involved or, at worst, sales efforts from companies that prioritise profit over meaningful change. Itās easy to be drawn to quick fixes, but meaningful change demands much more.
Perhaps embracing complexity and driving meaningful change requires a fundamental shift in mindsetāfrom relying on fixed strategies to accepting an ongoing, often messy process of learning and adaptation. But are we truly prepared for that?
How many leaders, c-suites, and boards are ready to admit that not everything can be planned or predicted? To see organisational change as a series of experiments, where success is uncertain and failure is part of the process? How many are willing to create spaces where people feel confident enough to challenge ideas, share their concerns, and try new approaches?
And from a behaviour change perspective, do enough of us understand the need to make changes easy, visible, and aligned with people's values? Or are we still stuck in the belief that a few workshops or directives will suffice?
Are We Missing the Mark?
So hereās the question I keep coming back to:
Why aren't "self-management" and "new ways of working" experts (myself included) more successful in transforming organisations?
Could the movementās cheerleaders be making it sound too easy, too utopian, glossing over just how difficult it is to drive behaviour change at scale? Do enough of us truly understand complexity and what it means for organisational change? Are new ways of working and self-management the wrong targets, and are we barking up the wrong tree in our quest to make work better?
š¤ Ultimately, do enough people in organisations really care about ways of working? And does our approach need a radical rethink?
Time to Reflect
After a good decade of effort, with several success stories, many more failed attempts, and, on balance, arguably limited progress for the movement, it seems a good time to reflect.
*Iām critical of our progress because Iām an optimist and believe we could be doing better. So, Iād love to hear your thoughts; hit reply and share your perspectiveāI always enjoy reading your responses.
--
š¤ In my next newsletter, I attempted to answer some of these big questions.
š Please support this newsletter by sharing it with your colleagues.
š The New Ways of Working Newsletter is brought to you by WorkPulse.