How Paradigms Shape—and Limit—Organisations 🌐
Organisations & Complexity #4
What if the way we see the world is holding us back? Paradigms shape not just what we think but how we act—and in organisations, they impact everything from how decisions are made to how teams collaborate. Yet, as history has shown, paradigms don’t last forever, nor are they gospel.
Today, most organisations still operate within the outdated linear paradigm: rigid hierarchies, predictable plans, and a focus on control. This mindset isn’t just inefficient—it’s risky business, especially when leaders treat the unpredictable as if it were predictable. Yet that’s precisely what most C-suites do.
So let’s explore why paradigms matter, how they shape our organisations, and why complexity offers a more adaptive and resilient way forward. Along the way, we’ll draw on lessons from science, nature, and history to uncover strategies for navigating the unpredictable world of work.
Cocooned in Paradigms 🐛
Paradigms are the invisible frameworks that shape how we see and make sense of the world. They act like a pair of tinted glasses: helpful in some contexts, but deeply limiting when the world shifts. Paradigms often reign for long stretches, offering stability and clarity—until they don’t. When cracks appear, when the existing paradigm can no longer explain the world as we see it, something profound happens: the paradigm shifts.
These shifts can feel like earthquakes, shaking the very foundation of what we hold to be true. Initially, they’re met with resistance. After all, who wants to admit the ground beneath their feet is more quicksand than bedrock? Yet history brims with examples of certainty unravelling. From astronomy to economics, seemingly unshakable truths have crumbled, giving way to revolutionary ideas.
Take the belief that Earth was the centre of the universe. This wasn’t just a theory; it was the truth, so sacrosanct that Galileo was sentenced to house arrest for daring to question it. Today, his defiance looks heroic—but imagine the courage it took to challenge a worldview so deeply entrenched.
Here’s the thing: paradigms aren’t just relics of science. They permeate every field—including management and organisational theory. The practices many organisations hold sacred today—rigid hierarchies, top-down control, the obsession with predictability—might be tomorrow’s equivalent of the geocentric model (the idea that the Earth is at the centre of the universe).
The question is: What assumptions are we clinging to in our ways of working? What cherished truths about management and leadership might future generations look back on with bewilderment?
The Paradigm of Certainties 🔍
The Enlightenment was a turning point—a declaration of independence for human thought. No longer shackled by the dogma of religious constraints or the authority of ancient philosophers, humanity began its great love affair with reason. Thinkers like René Descartes and Isaac Newton lit the spark, ushering in an era that promised the impossible: every problem solvable, every mystery decipherable.
Out of this intellectual revolution emerged what we now call the linear paradigm—a framework built on four reassuring pillars:
Order: Specific causes produce specific effects, predictably and consistently. The universe, it was said, runs like clockwork.
Reductionism: To understand the whole, simply take it apart and study its pieces. The behaviour of the system, after all, is just the sum of its parts.
Predictability: Once we map out how a system works, the future becomes an equation waiting to be solved. Uncertainty? Tamed and conquered.
Determinism: If you know where something starts, you can predict exactly where it will go. Processes unfold along fixed, logical paths, like dominos falling in order.
This paradigm wasn’t just effective; it was revolutionary. It explained the laws of motion, fuelled the Industrial Age, and even sent man to the moon. It gave us a universe that felt not just knowable but controllable, and the confidence this inspired spread far beyond science.
Soon, the seductive logic of linear thinking infiltrated economics, international relations, and—of course—management. The allure was clear: order and predictability were antidotes to chaos. With enough data, the future could be mapped. With enough control, uncertainty could be eliminated. Experts became the high priests of this paradigm, promising clarity in an unpredictable world.
For organisations, this thinking translated into five-year plans, rigid hierarchies, and strategies crafted with mathematical precision. Leaders placed unwavering faith in models and metrics, convinced that the complexities of human systems could be distilled into tidy equations. Long-term strategies became dogma, each one clinging to the illusion that control over the future was just one more spreadsheet away.
Context is Key 🗝️
Not everything in life—or work—ticks like a clock. As our understanding of systems has evolved, we've realised the world isn’t a neatly ordered machine but a rich tapestry of both linear and non-linear phenomena.
The challenge for leaders and organisations lies in knowing when a linear approach fits and when it leads us astray.
Linear thinking, to be clear, isn’t obsolete. In the right contexts, it delivers extraordinary results. Consider SpaceX: designing and launching spacecraft is an astonishingly complicated endeavour, yet it operates largely within a linear realm where cause and effect are tightly coupled, and outcomes can be calculated with precision. Here, the linear paradigm excels, offering the predictability and control necessary to land rockets with breathtaking accuracy.
Organisations, however, exist in a very different world. Human systems are complex, unpredictable, and defined by relationships that are interdependent and ever-changing. In these environments, where outcomes emerge rather than follow a set path, clinging to a linear mindset can be more than just unhelpful—it can lead to outright failure. The challenge isn’t rejecting linearity wholesale but recognising when it’s inappropriate for the context you’re working with.
This distinction simplifies decision-making. Linear methods remain invaluable in predictable systems, where stability and control reign. But when navigating complexity, the rules change. Complexity demands collaboration, experimentation, and adaptability—approaches that allow us to respond to unpredictability rather than haplessly attempting to control it. Matching our tools to the system at hand liberates us from the frustrating pursuit of certainty in an uncertain world, allowing us to operate with greater clarity and confidence.
Ultimately, it’s not about choosing between simplicity and complexity. It’s about embracing both—each in their place—and having the wisdom to switch gears when the situation demands it. The real magic happens when we stop forcing the world to conform to our wonky linear worldview and start working with its true nature.
Nonlinearity Arrives on the Scene 💥
The 20th century wasn’t just an era of scientific progress; it was a revolution. Einstein, Bohr, Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and Dirac didn’t tear down Newton’s towering achievements—they built on top of them. Their discoveries expanded our understanding of reality, revealing a world that was far messier, more unpredictable, and infinitely more fascinating. Linear methods, they showed, had limits. Beyond those limits lay phenomena that were fundamentally nonlinear and probabilistic.
This revolution shattered the comforting predictability of Newton’s universe. Where Newton had mapped a cosmos of order and determinism, these pioneers showed that some systems refuse to play by those rules. Nonlinear systems break every rule of linearity:
Order: Cause and effect don’t follow neat, predictable chains. Instead, they interact in ways that defy straightforward logic.
Reductionism: The whole is far more than the sum of its parts. Nonlinear systems exhibit emergent behaviours—patterns and outcomes that simply can’t be predicted by examining individual components.
Predictability: Even with mountains of data, uncertainty reigns. Reliable forecasts for these systems are elusive at best.
Determinism: Instead of unfolding along clear, logical paths, nonlinear systems are capable of veering wildly into the unexpected.
These ideas didn’t land gently. They upset long-standing assumptions and were often met with resistance or outright dismissal. The scientific community—steeped in reductionist models and metaphors of simpler times—was slow to embrace this unsettling new reality. Old habits die hard, especially when they bring comfort.
The implications for organisations today are striking. Like scientists of the past, most leaders cling to outdated, linear approaches. The belief that granular predictions or controlling variables can guarantee results remains pervasive, even as reality relentlessly proves otherwise. In a world buzzing with complexity, these assumptions are not just outdated—they’re dangerous.
The lesson is clear: just as science had to confront the limits of linearity, so too must organisations and their leaders. Recognising when to apply adaptive thinking over rigid models isn’t just a theoretical exercise—it’s an urgent, practical necessity for navigating today’s unpredictable world.
The Dance Between Chaos and Order 🕺
Complex adaptive systems hold a fascinating secret: they create stability not by avoiding chaos, but by embracing it. Unlike linear systems, which rely on predictability and operate close to equilibrium, complex systems thrive far from this still, balanced state.
Equilibrium, in this context, is like a perfectly calm lake—no ripples, no movement, just static order. It’s what happens when a system is isolated, with no energy flowing in or out. Linear systems function well near equilibrium, where maintaining order is straightforward. But complex adaptive systems—like organisations, ecosystems, or even our planet—exist far from equilibrium. They stay active and adaptive by continuously drawing energy from their surroundings, balancing on the edge between chaos and order.
Take Earth, for example. Without the Sun’s energy, it would settle into a cold, lifeless equilibrium. Instead, the Sun fuels countless local interactions that create something extraordinary: life. Life is an emergent property of Earth’s dynamic complexity—a phenomenon that could never arise in a static, linear system. Isn’t that right, moon?
The Organisational Implication 💼
For organisations, the lesson is profound. Stability doesn’t come from rigid control but from embracing the micro-interactions—like the flow of ideas, the friction of debate, and the spark of collaboration—that fuel energy and adaptation. Just as weather patterns and ecosystems depend on local turbulence to sustain global stability, organisations need creative tension and ongoing exchange to thrive. In complex systems, order and disorder aren’t opposites—they’re dance partners. And that’s where the magic happens.
The principles of complex adaptive systems aren’t confined to nature—they’re alive and well in organisations. Like ecosystems, organisations thrive not by clinging to rigid control but by promoting continuous interactions and energy flows. Stability, in this context, isn’t about freezing everything into place. Instead, it’s about enabling constant adaptation—embracing the creative tension and small-scale chaos that fuel self-organisation and innovation.
When leaders understand this, it transforms how we approach strategy, culture, and leadership. It moves us away from the comforting but false idea of perfect equilibrium and into a mindset of resilience. Resilient organisations don’t rely on static plans; they evolve through dynamic exchanges, experimentation, and trust in emergent solutions. The future belongs to those who embrace this reality.
Self-Organisation: Nature’s Blueprint for Resilience 💪
Nonlinear systems often look like a mess. At first glance, they seem chaotic, with countless parts interacting in ways that defy logic or control. But appearances can deceive. Beneath the apparent disorder lies a remarkable dynamic: these systems have a unique ability to self-organise. From local chaos, they generate stable and sustainable global patterns. This is the paradox of nonlinearity—global order emerging from local disorder through self-organisation.
Take a forest ecosystem, for example. Each tree, animal, and microorganism interacts with its surroundings in a dynamic web of competition and cooperation. There’s no central authority orchestrating the system, yet the forest thrives as a resilient, balanced whole. The secret lies in its interconnectedness. These countless local interactions fuel self-organisation, enabling the forest to adapt, grow, and sustain itself even in the face of disruption.
The same principle applies to organisations. Just as ecosystems rely on decentralised interactions to thrive, self-organising teams demonstrate the power of autonomy and collaboration. When individuals and teams are trusted to adapt, experiment, and make decisions locally, they create the conditions for resilience and innovation to emerge. Leaders don’t need to micromanage every detail; instead, their role becomes about cultivating an environment where self-organisation can flourish.
This principle, echoed across the life sciences and now embraced in progressive organisations, highlights self-organisation as a driver of resilience and adaptability. Nonlinear systems like ecosystems and self-organising teams don’t depend on rigid control; instead, they rely on emergent adaptability—the ability to balance order and chaos naturally. Recognising this dynamic opens the door to new ways of thinking about leadership and resilience.
Lessons for Modern Organisations 💡
The same dynamics play out in organisations. Teams, departments, and individuals constantly interact in ways that can seem chaotic and unpredictable. Yet when these interactions are nurtured, they can produce something extraordinary: a stable, adaptive, and innovative organisational culture. The key isn’t rigid control but creating the conditions for healthy human interactions to emerge.
This principle—that complexity fosters adaptability—has transformed how we understand systems in disciplines ranging from biology to economics. Over the last century, however, many fields resisted this shift. Economists in the mid-20th century, for example, sought to turn their discipline into a linear science, as precise and predictable as physics. This ambition rested on the misguided belief that scientific methods could deliver mastery over both nature and human society.
But these linear frameworks, while useful in some contexts, fell short in capturing the messy, interconnected realities of human systems. Postmodernism later challenged the grand narratives of predictability, introducing scepticism around so-called universal truths. Yet scepticism alone wasn’t enough to guide action. Complexity science offers a more balanced perspective: while humans can make meaningful improvements, we must also accept the inherent limits of control in complex systems.
For organisations, this balance is critical. Leaders must recognise that their role isn’t to control every variable but to cultivate the right conditions for emergence. By embracing uncertainty and encouraging healthy collaboration, organisations can unlock resilience and innovation that rigid strategies can’t achieve. Complexity reminds us that progress is possible—but not always predictable.
Complexity in Practice ✨
The shift toward complexity science carries profound implications for organisations. If we view the linear-reductionist approach as the thesis and postmodernism as its antithesis, then complexity science becomes the synthesis—a framework that weaves together the strengths of both while addressing their blind spots. While traditional models often fail to capture the intricacies of human behaviour, instinct and populist rhetoric don’t fare much better. Instead, leaders must dive deeper, exploring the interwoven forces driving group dynamics and interactions.
Game Theory offers an example of this deeper perspective, examining how cooperation and competition emerge among individuals, teams, and states. For organisations, this means moving beyond superficial analyses or rigid command-and-control structures. Leadership in complex systems requires understanding the unseen patterns and feedback loops that shape group behaviour and performance.
Embracing complexity encourages organisations to let go of the illusion of control. Instead of imposing top-down solutions that assume predictability, leaders can create environments where healthy interactions and innovation flourish. This approach enables resilient systems—organisations capable of responding to unforeseen challenges and capitalising on emergent opportunities. It’s about finding a balance between structure and flexibility, enabling teams to self-organise while remaining aligned with strategic goals.
Humanity’s Journey to Complexity 🌍
Human society is relatively young—just 250,000 years old, a blink in Earth’s timeline. What began as small family groups evolved into tribes, city-states, and eventually sprawling global networks. Throughout this evolution, three primary behavioural regimes have defined our interactions: order, chaos, and self-organised complexity. These regimes reflect the constant interplay between stability and unpredictability, creating global patterns where order and chaos mix in dynamic balance.
This balance produces self-organised complexity: a state where systems are both resilient and adaptable. It’s how ecosystems thrive, how societies evolve, and how teams succeed amid uncertainty. For organisations, this insight provides a powerful mindset shift: stop fearing unpredictability, and start cultivating the conditions where innovation emerges naturally.
A New Leadership Mindset 🌱
For organisations to thrive in complexity, leaders must shift their focus. Rigid stability is not the goal, nor is it realistic in an unpredictable world. Instead, effective leadership involves creating environments where adaptability and self-organisation can flourish.
This means embracing distributed decision-making, cultivating a culture of continuous learning, and staying responsive to change. Organisations that value openness and experimentation build the resilience needed to navigate uncertainty. By advancing trust, empowering teams, and encouraging collaboration, leaders can unlock the creativity and innovation essential for long-term success.
The business world is not a static system—it’s a constantly shifting landscape of relationships, challenges, and opportunities. To survive, organisations must evolve. To flourish, they must embrace the complexity that defines them.
So what? ❓
As organisations, we stand at a crossroads. The linear paradigm, once revolutionary, is no longer enough to navigate today’s interconnected, unpredictable world. Complexity shows us that stability doesn’t come from control but from adaptability. Progress isn’t about sticking to a rigid path but about creating the conditions for innovation and resilience to emerge.
Leaders who embrace this mindset unlock something extraordinary: the power of their people to self-organise, adapt, and innovate. They let go of the illusion of predictability and instead focus on culture, collaboration, engagement and experimentation.
In complexity, chaos isn’t the enemy—it’s part of the equation. By leaning into the dynamic interplay of order and disorder, organisations can find new ways to grow and thrive. The future of work isn’t about conquering uncertainty; it’s about learning to dance with it.
If you missed the earlier instalments in this series, here they are:
If you find this helpful, please help me by sharing this newsletter. 🙏
